The Biggest Disappointment of CS5

April 28, 2010

sbBesides the icons—which look disgusting btw—the biggest disappointment in my eyes is Soundbooth.

With all these amazing programs getting a substantial number of new amazing features… Soundbooth was hiding in the background. There are only three new features listed on Adobe’s site are:

  • Being able to change the height of tracks in multitrack view
  • Being able to split a sound in half (CTRL/CMD+K)
  • More royalty-free sound effects and Soundbooth Scores

Three new features. That’s it.

Adobe is typically known for it’s innovation—pushing boundaries. What’s going on here?

A few years ago, Adobe purchased a program called “Cool Edit Pro” and rebranded it as Audition and stuck it in their CS2, and CS3. This precursor to Soundbooth was a bit bloated, but was a very powerful audio editing and mixing tool. It allowed you to quickly target and select audio channels (left or right). It had a bunch of great audio filters, things like “Invert” which is great for sound cancellation, as well as pitch tools for warping the pitch over time (for example, the way a turntable winds down).

CS4 comes around, and we get a new boiled-down, insanely basic piece of software called Soundbooth. The Creative Suite is full of fully-fledged massive amazing software… so why add a basic, boiled down program. It doesn’t make sense…

The only reason I can think of that they did this is that Auditon was a Windows-only piece of software, and it was probably easier to build a new program from the ground. Fair enough… I just wish they wouldn’t have slacked off. So many essential tools and filters are still missing… even for “basic” users who aren’t audio producers. Heck, free programs like Audacity can do more than Soundbooth can.

And sure, Audition still exists… but it hasn’t been updated in a while (to the best of my knowledge), and it is a little too expensive after already purchasing an entire suite.

Don’t get me wrong… I’ve learned to love Soundbooth. It’s the only program I’ve been able to find that allows me to edit audio spectrally. It’s amazing the sounds you can remove by editing a spectral waveform. I’ve been able to seamlessly remove birds, nose whistles, camera clacking, microphone popping, wind rumble, and other distractions. The only problem is that it takes forever. Imagine removing the moon against a gradient sky from a photograph photo-realistically… using only the pencil tool in Microsoft Paint. Defnintely not impossible, but it would take hours.

The next logical step in Soundbooth’s progression would be to add a spectral healing/cloning brush tool. This would set Soundbooth so far above any program I’ve ever seen. Right now, sound can really only be removed… it can’t be added (specularly). If someone coughs (outside, with moderate background noise), I can try to remove it at a spectral level, but what I will be left with is this sort of robotic echoing ghost of the cough. Reason being, “Remove a Sound” only really reduces the volume of a sound based on the volume on either side of the noise. The actual pulsations of the wave still exist, but the volume is reduced.

It would be so easy to just sample an empty area of sound and paint over top of the sound I want to remove.

So yeah, this post is running long, and I doubt anyone will ever read this…

…but yeah. Not so impressed with the lack of innovation

0 Comments
Category: Misc, Music, Programming, Software, Technology | Tags: , , ,

Adobe Flash “Layer” Blending Mode Uncovered

April 28, 2010

moogaloopCulprits: YouTube; CollegeHumor; DailyMotion

Description: When a MovieClip inside of Flash is faded (alpha is applied), each object inside the MovieClip gets the alpha applied to it independently. This leads to you being able to see through things you probably shouldn’t. It’s the simplest fix too… choose the “Layer” blending mode. Nobody seems to know this though… and it ticks me off.

0 Comments
Category: Internet, Software, Technology | Tags: , , ,

AS3 Image Loader Smoothing

March 21, 2010

The Problem: Turning on smoothing for an image that has been dynamically loaded using Loader

A Solution: After the image has finished loading, use the following code to smooth the image.

var image:Bitmap=Bitmap(myLoader.content);
image.smoothing=true;
0 Comments
Category: Internet, Programming, Software, Technology | Tags: , , , , , ,

Photoshop Suggestions

November 9, 2009

Here’s some of the stuff I’d love to see in the next version of Photoshop, CS5.

  • Fractal Interpolation. Here’s a good example of what I’m talking about… http://meesoft.logicnet.dk/Analyzer/help/help3.htm
  • A pen tool that allows dynamically feathered paths.It would be great to be able to dynamically feather a path in Photoshop. Take the image to the right for example. It would be difficult to select this shape with the Pen Tool, since it’s a vector tool. After the path is created, you would have to manually blur the edges of the selection using Lens Blur or the blur tool. This is not ideal. It would be great to have the ability to go back and use some sort of bezier curves to dynamically feather a path after creating it.
  • Fully-fledged font manager. Alphabetical sorting just isn’t good enough. Adobe should create a program that takes all the fonts in your computer, compares them to an online database, and downloads detailed information about each font. If you were looking for a script font, all you would have to do is pick the tag “script” from a list, and voila—All of your script fonts would show up. It could even have the ability to suggest new fonts… you could think of it like Apple Geunis for font selection. I know it would be a feat, but well worth it. It would need to be pretty easy for people to submit new fonts to Adobe’s database, so that all virtually all fonts can be in their database. The manager would also need to open up in seconds to be useful. If it takes as long as Adobe Bridge does to open, it will be useless.
  • Sub-pixel text rendering. I know it’s not the best idea to embed sub-pixel rendered text in an image because people with old CRTs would see it funny, but I think it would be great to at least have the option.
  • Liquify breaks out of the box. There is absolutely no reason that Liquify (which has been spelt wrong since day one… shouldn’t it be Liquefy?) should open up in it’s own window. TADA!Liquify
  • Add and Subtract Blending Modes. See here.
  • Leading in relative terms. Defining a block of text’s leading using pixels is frustrating, especially when you spend time tweaking font sizes. You’ll always have to go back and dial in a new leading number. If there was some sort of relative leading, perhaps in pixels or ems, it would make life oh, so much easier.
  • Normal blending mode in Layer Styles by default. When creating a drop shadow or a glow, Photoshop picks blending modes like Screen and Multiply. This can be quite confusing to beginners. “Why can’t I see my black glow? Why isn’t my white drop shadow working?”
  • Open a GIF image and retain frames. You can create an animated image in Photoshop and save it as a gif. If you open an animated gif file however, Photoshop proceeds to tell you that it can only open the first frame? Why???

What do you think?

0 Comments
Category: Software | Tags: ,

Helvetica and Windows 7, why can’t we get along?

November 4, 2009

At work, I’ve been upgraded to a new 64-bit Windows 7 computer and was stunned to find out that Helvetica was not installed. Seriously? Helvetica is one of the very few default computer fonts that “everybody” seems to have. I couldn’t be more disappointed. I know it’s generally heralded that Helvetica is primarily a Mac font. Even so… I’ve always had it.

Sure, the new bundled ClearType fonts are crisp… but only Windows users are going to have these. They’re not free fonts. Unless a font comes pre-installed on all future operating systems, it’s not going to have widespread adoption.

Microsoft’s ClearType technology completely fails with most fonts larger than 14 point size. Most large fonts are aliased and have jagged edges. A great example: YouTube. Video titles look absolutely horrid in my opinion. I was hoping Windows 7 would fix this problem. Nope.

Helvetica is one of my favourite web fonts—especially at large sizes. I’m not entirely sure why some fonts, like Helvetica, completely ignore the ClearType rules and get rendered with old-fashioned, non-sub-pixel rendering. At least it looks good big though!

I’m also sad that Safari has defaulted to Windows ClearType, rather than using Mac’s own sub-pixel rendering system. Luckily, you can still turn it back on.

Back to my core issue: no Helvetica? I tried to download it but it isn’t available for free. You’d hope that the default weight of Helvetica would be free by now, but nope.

I couldn’t be more depressed. Well, of course I could… but it’s disappointing nonetheless.

0 Comments
Category: Internet, Technology, Typography | Tags: , , , , ,

Blending Modes

September 28, 2009

There’s one thing that’s been on my mind for a few years. What’s up with Blending Modes? They always seem to behave differently. In Photoshop, opacity ruins the effect. In Flash, it all relies on alpha, not luminosity. In AfterEffects?

Here’s an image that I’ve concocted which checks for exposure-like qualities.

Blend

In conclusion, Adobe really needs to stop calling Linear Dodge ‘Add’ because that’s really not what it is. ‘Add’ should work with luminosity and transparency the way it does in After Effects.

  • Photoshop should add two blending modes: Add and Subtract. These should function similarly to Linear Dodge and Linear Burn, but also work with alpha (the way Add does in After Effects).
  • After Effects should add a blending mode entitled Subtract, which is the exact opposite effect of Add.
0 Comments
Category: Software | Tags: ,

What’s in store for Adobe’s CS5?

September 5, 2009

Who knows? There is a blog I found here that has a bit of info.

Being a veteran user of Adobe programs, here is what I’d like to see in the next version of Creative Suite, CS5.

Uniformity.

Back in September of 2003, a number of Adobe’s flagship programs were bundled together for the first time ever. Since then, Adobe has released three more versions of their Creative Suite. It’s time for some uniformity among programs. Why should items with the same name act differently in different programs? Why should items that function similarly be called different names? A lot of times, they probably shouldn’t.

  • Pen tool: One of the only things Illustrator has done right since day one. In Illustrator, after drawing a bezier curve, clicking on the anchor point will remove half the handle. In Photoshop, you must Alt/Option click. Single clicking on an anchor point in Photoshop does nothing. In Illustrator, the Alt key can convert an anchor point. Not always the case in Photoshop. Dragging a handle into the anchor point itself will remove that handle… only in Illustrator. Why?! And don’t even get me started about the pen tool in Flash. It’s basically useless.
  • Paste: Paste into, Paste in Place, Paste in Front/Back. None of Adobe’s programs handle pasting the same way. Adobe, pick your pony.
  • Break Apart/Convert Text to Outlines: There should be some uniformity here. There isn’t.
  • Brush tools: Adobe, please find a happy medium between Flash and Illustrator. Stop calling it a “blob” brush. Change the name of the other brush to the “stroke paintbrush” or something.
  • Text: Text tools should be more unified. I’d die to have the ability to extend truncated text from a text field into a new field the way InDesign works. Kerning, Leading, Indenting, and more. Come up with a standard.
  • Transform: Control+T in Photoshop is free transforming. It’d be great to free transform in Flash with this shortcut by default.
  • Shortcuts: It would be great to have some sort of global keyboard shortcut manager. Each program has different keyboard shortcuts, but these vary wildly from one program to another.

This post is running a little long, so I’ll stop here. I plan to write more posts with specific ideas I have for each program, so stay posted.

0 Comments
Category: Software | Tags: , , , ,

Hello world!

September 3, 2009

Welcome to my new personal blog! I have some ideas of the sorts of things I’d like to write in here, but who knows when I’ll have the time…

0 Comments
Category: Internet, Personal | Tags: , ,